Database Menu
About CropLife
About our industry
Press room
Resource Centre
Details
Categories

    Papers of the Benefits of Biotechnology Database

    A full listing of the 91 papers in the database is shown below.

    Clicking on any paper title will take you to the paper abstract and show the categories under which the paper is stored in the database.

    Papers:

    1. Projecting the benefits of Golden Rice in the Philippines.Externally held, protected paper
      Zimmermann R. & Qaim M. (2002).
    2. Plant biotechnology in China. Externally held, protected paper
      Huang J, Rozelle S, Pray C, Wang Q (2002).
    3. The release of genetically modified crops into the environment. Part II. Overview of ecological risk assessment.Externally held, protected paper
      Conner AJ, Glare TR, Nap JP (2003).
    4. The use of genetically modified crops in developing countries.
      Nuffield Council on Bioethics (2003).
    5. Bt cotton in South Africa: adoption and impact on farm incomes amongst small- and large-scale farmers.
      Kirsten J. and Gouse M. (2002).
    6. Biodiversity in Glyphosate Tolerant Fodder Beet Fields. Timing of herbicide application.
      Strandberg B. and Bruus Pedersen M. (2002).
    7. Conservation tillage and plant biotechnology: how new technologies can improve the environment by reducing the need to plow
      Conservation Technology Information Center, West Lafayette, IN (2002).
    8. The state of food and agriculture. Agricultural biotechnology: meeting the needs of the poor? Externally held, protected paper
      F.A.O. (2004).
    9. Five years of Bt cotton in China - the benefits continueExternally held, protected paper
      Pray CE, Huang J, Hu R, and Rozelle S (2002).
    10. Environmental benefits of genetically modified crops: Global and European perspectives on their ability to reduce pesticide use
      Phipps RH and Park JR (2002).
    11. The economic status and performance of plant biotechnology in 2003: adoption, research and development in the United States.Externally held, protected paper
      Runge CF and Ryan B (2003).
    12. Agricultural Biotechnology Development, Policy and Impact in China.Externally held, protected paper
      Huang J, Hu R, Wang Q, Keeley J, Falck-Zepeda J (2003).
    13. Long-term regional suppression of pink bollworm by Bacillus thuringiensis cotton.Externally held, protected paper
      Carriere Y, Ellers-Kirk C, Sisterson M, Antilla L, Whitlow M, Dennehy TJ, and Tabashnik BE (2003).
    14. Ecological impacts of Bt cottonExternally held, protected paper
      Zipf AE and Rajasekaran K (2003).
    15. Modelling Possible Impacts of GM Crops on Australian Trade, Productivity.
      Stone S. Stone S, Matysek A, and Dolling A (2002).
    16. The economic impacts of biotechnology-based technological innovations. ESA Working Paper No. 04-08.
      Traxler, G. (2004).
    17. The farm level impact of using Roundup Ready soybeans in Romania
      Brookes, G. (2003).
    18. Advances in plant biotechnology and its adoption in developing countriesExternally held, protected paper
      Toenniessen, GH, O'Toole, JC, and DeVries, J (2003).
    19. Bt cotton benefits, costs and impacts in China
      Huang J, Hu R, Fan C, Pray CE, and Rozelle S (2003).
    20. Transgenic Rootworm Corn: Assessing Potential Agronomic, Economic, and Environmental Benefits
      Marlin E. Rice (2004).
    21. Medium Grains, High stakes: Economics of Genetically Modified Rice in California
      Craig A. Bond, Colin A. Carter, and Y. Hossein Farzin (2003).
    22. Impacts on US agriculture of biotechnology-derived crops planted in 2003-An update of eleven case studies
      S. Sankula and E. Blumenthal (2004).
    23. The farm level impact of using Bt maize in Spain
      Brookes G (2002).
    24. GM rice: will this lead the way for global acceptance of GM crop technology?
      Brookes G & Barfoot P (2003).
    25. Agricultural Biotechnology: Potential for use in developing countries.
      Abdalla A, Berry P, Connell P, Tran Q T, Buetre B (2003).
    26. Economic, ecological, food safety, and social consequences of the deployment of Bt transgenic plants.
      Shelton A M, Zhao J-Z, Roush RT (2002).
    27. Responses of plants and invertebrate trophic groups to contrasting herbicide regimes in the Farm Scale Evaluations of genetically modified herbicide-tolerant crops.
      Hawes C, Haughton AJ, Osborne JL, Roy DB, Clark SJ, Perry JN, Rothery P, Bohan DA, Brooks DR, Champion GT, Dewar AM, Heard MS, Woiwod IP, Daniels RE, Young MW, Parish AM, Scott RJ, Firbank LG, and Squire GR (2003).
    28. Weeds in fields with contrasting conventional and genetically modified herbicide-tolerant crops. II. Effects on individual species
      Heard MS, Hawes C, Champion GT, Clark SJ, Firbank LG, Haughton AJ, Parish AM, Perry JN, Rothery P, Roy DB, Scott RJ, Skellern MP, Squire GR, and Hill MO (2003).
    29. Weeds in fields with contrasting conventional and genetically modified herbicide-tolerant crops. I. Effects on abundance and diversity.
      Heard MS, Hawes C, Champion GT, Clark SJ, Firbank LG, Haughton AJ, Parish AM, Perry JN, Rothery P, Scott RJ, Skellern MP, Squire GR, and Hill MO (2003).
    30. Benefits from Bt cotton use by smallholder farmers in South Africa.
      Ismael Y, Bennett R, and Morse S (2002).
    31. The payoffs to transgenic field crops: An assessment of the evidence.
      Marra MC, Pardey PG, Alston JM (2002).
    32. Economic consequences for UK farmers of growing GM herbicide tolerant sugar beet. Externally held, protected paper
      May M.J. (2003).
    33. Plant biotechnology: potential impact for improving pest management in European agriculture. Oilseed Rape – Herbicide-Tolerant Case Study
      Gianessi L, Sankula S, and Reigner N (2003).
    34. Plant Biotechnology: current and potential impact for improving pest management in U.S. agriculture. An analysis of 40 case studies.
      Gianessi LP, Silvers CS, Sankula S, Carpenter JE. (2002).
    35. Deploying the Full Arsenal: Fighting Hunger with Biotechnology.Externally held, protected paper
      Lacy, P. (2003).
    36. Transgenic virus resistant papaya: from hope to reality for controlling payaya ringspot virus in HawaiiExternally held, protected paper
      Gonsalves D, Gonsalves C, Ferreira S, Pitz K, Fitch M, Manshardt R, and Slightom J (2004).
    37. Consultancy support for the analysis of the impact of GM crops on UK farm profitability. Final report submitted to The Strategy Unit of the Cabinet Office. Dorchester, Dorset.
      PG Economics Ltd. (2003).
    38. GM Crops: The Global Scio-economic and Environmental Impact - The First Nine Years 1996-2004
      Brookes G, & Barfoot P (2005).
    39. Co-existence of GM and non GM arable crops: case study of the UK.
      Brookes G, & Barfoot P (2003).
    40. Co-existence in North American agriculture: can GM crops be grown with conventional and organic crops?
      Brookes G, & Barfoot P (2004).
    41. Co-existence of GM and non GM crops: case study of maize grown in Spain
      Brookes G, & Barfoot P (2003).
    42. Coexistence of GM and non-GM arable crops: the non-GM and organic context in the EU
      Brookes G, & Barfoot P (2004).
    43. The Payoffs to Agricultural Biotechnology: An Assessment of the Evidence
      Marra, M. C., Philip G. Pardey, P.G, and J. M. Alston (2002).
    44. Environmental and human health impacts of growing genetically modified herbicide-tolerant sugar beet: a life-cycle assessment. Externally held, protected paper
      Bennett R, Phipps R, Strange A, Grey P (2004).
    45. Yield effects of genetically modified crops in developing countries. Externally held, protected paper
      Qaim M., Zilberman D. (2003).
    46. Insect-Resistant GM Rice in Farmers' Fields: Assessing Productivity and Health Effects in ChinaExternally held, protected paper
      Huang J, Hu R, Rozelle S, Pray C (2005).
    47. Transgenic Cotton in Mexico
      Traxler G, Godoy-Avila S (2004).
    48. Agricultural biotechnology in developing countries: a briefing paper for Sida
      Bhagavan, M. R.; Virgin, I. (2004).
    49. The farm level impact of using GM agronomic traits in Polish arable crops
      Brookes G, Aniol A (2005).
    50. Size and Distribution of Market Benefits From Adopting Biotech CropsExternally held, protected paper
      Price GK, Lin W, Falek-Zepeda JB, Fernandez-Cornejo J (2003).
    51. Managing genetically modified crops in Australia - GM crops, segregation and liability in Australian agricultureExternally held, protected paper
      ACIL Tasman Pty Ltd (2005).
    52. Comparative Environmental Impacts of Biotechnology-derived and Traditional Soybean, Corn, and Cotton CropsExternally held, protected paper
      Carpenter, J., A. Felsot, T. Goode, M. Hammig, D. Onstad, and S. Sankula (2002).
    53. Biotechnology-Derived Crops Planted in 2004 - Impacts on US AgricultureExternally held, protected paper
      Sankula S, Marmon G, Blumenthal E (2005).
    54. Crop Biotechnology and the Future of Food: A Scientific AssessmentExternally held, protected paper
      Chassy B et al. (2005).
    55. Agronomics and Sustainability of Transgenic Cotton in Argentina
      Qaim M, Cap E, Janvry A (2003).
    56. Impact of Bt corn(Mon 810) in the Philippines: an overview
      Sonny P. Tababa (2005).
    57. Economic Impact of Genetically Modified cotton in India
      Bennett RM, Ismael Y, Kambhampati U, and Morse S (2004).
    58. An Economic Cost-Benefit Analysis of GM Crop Cultivation: An Irish Case StudyExternally held, protected paper
      Flannery ML, Thorne FS, Kelly PW, Mullens E (2004).
    59. Global impact of insect-resistant (Bt) cotton.Externally held, protected paper
      Purcel JP, Perlak FJ (2004).
    60. The Impact of the Introduction of Transgenic Crops in Argentinean AgricultureExternally held, protected paper
      Trigo EJ, Cap EJ (2003).
    61. Potential health benefits of Golden Rice: a Philippine case studyExternally held, protected paper
      Zimmermann R, Qaim M (2004).
    62. Biotechnology and the African FarmerExternally held, protected paper
      Eicher CK, Maredia K, Sithole-Niang I (2005).
    63. Farm-Level Economic Performance of Genetically Modified Cotton in Maharashtra, IndiaExternally held, protected paper
      Bennett R, Kambhampati U, Morse S, Ismael Y (2006).
    64. Monitoring the impact of GM cotton in India
      Morse, S., Bennett, R. M. and Kambhampati, U. (2005).
    65. An Application of Life-cycle Assessment for Environmental Planning and Management - The Potential Environmental and Human Health Impacts of Growing Genetically-modified Herbicide-tolerant Sugar Beet
      Bennett, R., Phipps, R., Strange, A. (2006).
    66. Economic Impact of Transgenic Crops in Developing CountriesExternally held, protected paper
      Raney, T. (2006).
    67. Recent and Prospective Adoption of Genetically Modified Cotton: A Global CGE Analysis of Economic ImpactsExternally held, protected paper
      Anderson K, Valenzuela E, Jackson LA (2006).
    68. Bt cotton and pesticide use in Argentina:economic and environmental effectsExternally held, protected paper
      Qaim, M., De Janvry, A (2005).
    69. Management of genetically modified herbicide tolerant sugar beet for spring and autumn environmental benefitExternally held, protected paper
      May MJ, Champion GT, Dewar AM, Qi A, Pidgeon JD (2005).
    70. Global Status of Commercialized Biotech/GM Crops: 2006 (ISAAA Briefs No 35)
      James C. (2006).
    71. Ten Years of GeneticallyModified Crops in ArgentineAgricultureExternally held, protected paper
      Trigo EJ, Cap EJ (2006).
    72. Genetically Modified Food and International Trade - The Case of India, Bangladesh, Indonesia, and the PhilippinesExternally held, protected paper
      Gruère G, Bouët A, Mevel S (2007).
    73. Implications of Gene Flow in the Scale-up and Commercial Use of Biotechnology-derived Crops: Economic and Policy ConsiderationsExternally held, protected paper
      CAST (2007).
    74. Canola and Australian Farming Systems 2003-2007Externally held, protected paper
      Norton RM, Roush RT (2007).
    75. The Economic Impacts of Introducing Bt Technology in Smallholder Cotton Production Systems of West Africa: A Case Study from MaliExternally held, protected paper
      Vitale J, Boyer T, Uiene R, Sanders JH (2007).
    76. The benefits of adopting genetically modified, insect resistant (Bt) maize in the European Union (EU): first results from 1998-2006 plantings Graham Brookes Externally held, protected paper
      Brookes G (2007).
    77. Global Impact of Biotech Crops: Socio-Economic and Environmental Effects in the First Ten Years of Commercial Use. Externally held, protected paper
      Brookes G, Barfoot P (2006).
    78. GM Crops: The First Ten Years - Global Socio-Economic and Environmental Impacts (ISAAA Briefing No. 36).Externally held, protected paper
      Brookes G, Barfoot P (2006).
    79. Global Status of Commercialized Biotech/GM Crops: 2007 (ISAAA Briefing No 37) Executive SummaryExternally held, protected paper
      James C (2007).
    80. Field Evidence: Bt Corn and Mycotoxin Reduction
      Wu F (2008).
    81. Transgenic rice lines that include barley genes have increased tolerance to low iron availability in a calcareous paddy soilExternally held, protected paper
      Suzuki M et al (2008).
    82. First impact of biotechnology in the EU: Bt Maize adoption in Spain Externally held, protected paper
      Demont M, Tollens E (2004).
    83. The use of life-cycle assessment to evaluate the environmental impacts of growing genetically modified, nitrogen use-efficient canolaExternally held, protected paper
      Strange A, Park J, Bennett R, Phipps R (2008).
    84. Economic impacts of glyphosate-resistant cropsExternally held, protected paper
      Gianessi LP (2007).
    85. A Critical Assessment of the Effects of Bt Transgenic Plants on Parasitoids
      Chen M, et al (2008).
    86. GM crops: global socio-economic and environmental impacts-2006
      Brookes G, Barfoot P (2008).
    87. Adoption and performance of the first GM crop introduced in EU agriculture: Bt maize in Spain
      GĂłmez-Barbero M, Berbel J, RodrĂ­guez-Cerezo E (2008).
    88. Suppression of Cotton Bollworm in Multiple Crops in China in Areas with Bt Toxin–Containing CottonExternally held, protected paper
      Wu KM et al (2008).
    89. Introducing a genetically modified banana in Uganda : Social benefits, costs, and consumer perceptions.Externally held, protected paper
      Falck-Zepeda J, Kilkuwe E, Wesseler J (2008).
    90. Genetic engineering for the poor: Golden Rice and public health in India.Externally held, protected paper
      Stein, AJ, Sachdev HPS, Qaim M. (2008).
    91. The economic impacts of second generation Bt cotton in West Africa: empirical evidence from Burkina Faso Externally held, protected paper
      Vitale J, Glick H, Greenplate J, Traore O (2008).
    TOP
    Search all papers
    Keyword Search
    Links